- Microsoft was meant to make EU-specific changes to Azure by last month
- ECCO has issued its second amber report against Microsoft
- The company must now engage in Plan B
Microsoft has failed to deliver a special, EU-specific version of Azure – a milestone it was meant to achieve by mid-April 2025.
The Washington tech giant had previously committed to building a Hoster Product for EU providers, promising features like multi tenancy support, unlimited virtualization and pay-as-you-go SQL Server licensing.
It all stems from a November 2022 antitrust complaint, when CISPE accused Microsoft of engaging in anticompetitive business practices that saw it favor its own Azure cloud over competitors.
Microsoft missed a major CISPE antitrust milestone
CISPE complained that it was more expensive to run Microsoft software on rival cloud platforms than on Azure, thus the company pledged to tweak some of its licensing terms to open up competition.
The European Cloud Competition Observatory (ECCO) published its second report on Microsoft, maintaining its amber rating – not a good look for a company that’s been the subject of antitrust investigations on a global scale. “Some concerns exist but corrective actions have been proposed,” ECCO explains.
“Although there have been setbacks, specifically in the delivery of a product-based resolution, both sides continue to engage in positive discussions,” CISPE wrote.
CISPE Secretary General Francisco Mignorance commented: “It is disappointing that the proposed product did not deliver, but this is in not the end of the Agreement. Phase 2 opens the door to discuss alternative, commercially equivalent solutions that enable CISPE members and Europe’s cloud infrastructure providers to compete fairly, while still offering Microsoft’s productivity tools to their customers.”
Microsoft must now propose alternatives – a Plan B – by July 10, 2025, or face potential new legal action. In the meantime, the UK’s CMA continues to review the company’s licensing tactics.
TechRadar Pro has asked the company for more details on the missed deadline, but we did not receive an immediate response.
Leave a comment