R. Kelly is staying in prison on his sex trafficking and racketeering convictions for the required 30 years. His request for appeal was denied by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday (Feb. 12), per AP. The ruling was made after first hearing arguments last March.
The disgraced singer-songwriter was convicted back in 2021.
Kelly’s legal representation, Attorney Jennifer Bonjean, said in a statement that she feels the Supreme Court will agree to hear an appeal. She called the 2nd Circuit Court’s ruling “unprecedented,” adding that it gives prosecutors unlimited discretion to apply the racketeering law “to situations absurdly remote” from the statute’s intent.
The court declined to hear his appeal last year regarding his 20-year sentence from his 2022 child sex abuse charges in Chicago. The 2nd Circuit Court refused Kelly’s argument that the trial evidence was insufficient and the constitutionality of certain laws presented against him were questionable. The singer also felt four jurors were biased, said the trial judge made “improper rulings,” and believed that the racketeering charge was also inappropriate.
“Enabled by a constellation of managers, assistants, and other staff for over twenty-five years, Kelly exploited his fame to lure girls and young women into his grasp,” the appeals court said, and mentioned that members of his entourage helped introduce him to underage girls.
The three-judge panel continued, “Evidence at trial showed that he would isolate them from friends and family, control nearly every aspect of their lives, and abuse them verbally, physically, and sexually.”
The court noted that it was “neither arbitrary nor irrational” that several accusers who testified at trial said Kelly gave them herpes without disclosing he had the STD, and it was not “unduly prejudicial or cumulative” that seven of them who were minors at the time of abuse were also allowed to testify.
“None of the testimony was more inflammatory than the charged acts,” the appeals court said. When speaking on letting jurors view graphic videos as evidence of the abuse, the 2nd Circuit stated that it was not “unfairly prejudicial.” The videos “were properly admitted to show the means and methods of the enterprise, including the level of control and dominance Kelly had over his victims.”
Bonjean called out one 2nd Circuit judge, Richard J. Sullivan, and agreed with what he described as the majority’s “excellent opinion,” but disagreed with a restitution award given to one victim for a lifetime supply of a suppressive regime of herpes medication. “This was not restitution. This was an effort by the government to unfairly enrich government witnesses for their testimony,” Bonjean said.
Since being incarcerated, Kelly had paid over half-million dollars to victims, associated fines, and more.
Leave a comment